Database independent proteomics analysis of the ostrich and human proteome

peer-reviewed · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2012

peer-reviewed · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2012. A. F. Maarten Altelaar et al. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteome analysis relies heavily on the presence of complete protein databases…
Date 2012-01-10
Type peer-reviewed
Venue Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher National Academy of Sciences
Contribution adjacent
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1108399108
Citations (OpenAlex) 11
Venue 2-year citedness 8.56

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteome analysis relies heavily on the presence of complete protein databases. Such a strategy is extremely powerful, albeit not adequate in the analysis of unpredicted postgenome events, such as posttranslational modifications, which exponentially increase the search space. Therefore, it is of interest to explore “database-free” approaches. Here, we sampled the ostrich and human proteomes with a method facilitating de novo sequencing, utilizing the protease Lys-N in combination with electron transfer dissociation. By implementing several validation steps, including the combined use of collision-induced dissociation/electron transfer dissociation data and a cross-validation with conventional database search strategies, we identified approximately 2,500 unique de novo peptide sequences from the ostrich sample with over 900 peptides generating full backbone sequence coverage. This dataset allowed the appropriate positioning of ostrich in the evolutionary tree. The described database-free sequencing approach is generically applicable and has great potential in important proteomics applications such as in the analysis of variable parts of endogenous antibodies or proteins modified by a plethora of complex posttranslational modifications.

Authors

  1. A. F. Maarten Altelaar · Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Utrecht University
  2. Danny Navarro · Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Utrecht University
  3. Jos Boekhorst · Utrecht University
  4. Bas van Breukelen · Netherlands Bioinformatics Centre, Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Utrecht University
  5. Berend Snel · Utrecht University
  6. Shabaz Mohammed · Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Utrecht University
  7. Albert J. R. Heck · Center for Biomedical Genetics, Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Utrecht University

Methods and tools

Seen in the charts

Back to the full map

Back to top