DeepNovo

algorithm · CNN + RNN

DeepNovo: algorithm · CNN + RNN. The model that started the deep-learning wave (CNN+LSTM)

The model that started the deep-learning wave (CNN+LSTM)

Kind algorithm
Deep learning yes
Acquisition DDA
Family CNN + RNN

Code

Live stars, open issues and last-push figures are on the Code activity chart.

Checkpoints

Version Trained on Host Licence Size Checked Backup
train.example — Google Drive Non-commercial use (custom) 286 MB gated 2026-10-02 copy

A host marked archival has a DOI and keeps what it is given. The others can move or disappear, which is why they are checked rather than merely listed. verified means the bytes were fetched and hashed on the date shown; live means only that the host answered when last asked. Where a copy is linked, it is a backup of someone else’s weights kept in case the original link goes stale; the original is the link to cite and to prefer.

Benchmarks

  • denovo_benchmarks: median peptide-level average precision 0.200 over 86 datasets, median rank 14 of 14 (version bm-1.0.0).
  • ProteoBench, on the nine-species benchmark, ProteoBench selection: peptide-level AUC 0.586; precision 0.346 at 89% coverage; amino-acid AUC 0.613 (submitted 2026-08-07).

Both are mass-based matches on the tool’s most recent run. What these numbers mean.

Reported comparison

The comparison table this method’s own papers print, standardised: every value on a 0-1 scale, methods down the side, the measure and then the species across. These are numbers papers report about themselves and their baselines. They are not a leaderboard, and they do not compare across tables: each was produced by a different group, on the dataset named in its corner, with each baseline either retrained, run from released weights or quoted from another paper. Where the paper says which, it follows the method’s name (hover it for the sentence); most papers do not say. Bold is the best value in a column and underline the runner-up, our ranking rather than the paper’s own marks.

Table 1

Protein identification with deep learning: from abc to xyz, page 10: The recall of PEAKS and DeepNovo at the amino acid level and the peptide level.

S. cerevisiae proteome of Hebert et al. 2014 (The one hour yeast proteome), Orbitrap Fusion HCD; no accession Amino acid recall Peptide recall
PEAKS de novo · released 0.574 0.257
DeepNovo de novo 0.743 0.617
DeepNovo database search 0.899 0.898

Paper describing it

Papers using it (3)

Applications and evaluations that ran this method. They are not counted among its authors below.

Authors (5)

Ngoc Hieu Tran, Xianglilan Zhang, Lei Xin, Baozhen Shan, Ming Li

Seen in the charts

Back to the full map

Back to top