Curriculum Learning for Biological Sequence Prediction: The Case of De Novo Peptide Sequencing

preprint · ICML 2025 · 2025

preprint · ICML 2025 · 2025. Xiang Zhang (Shanghai AI Lab) et al. Peptide sequencing-the process of identifying amino acid sequences from mass spectrometry data-is a…
Date 2025-06-16
Type preprint
Venue ICML 2025
Publisher arXiv
Contribution algorithm
DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2506.13485
Citations (OpenAlex) 0

Abstract

Peptide sequencing-the process of identifying amino acid sequences from mass spectrometry data-is a fundamental task in proteomics. Non-Autoregressive Transformers (NATs) have proven highly effective for this task, outperforming traditional methods. Unlike autoregressive models, which generate tokens sequentially, NATs predict all positions simultaneously, leveraging bidirectional context through unmasked self-attention. However, existing NAT approaches often rely on Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) loss, which presents significant optimization challenges due to CTC’s complexity and increases the risk of training failures. To address these issues, we propose an improved non-autoregressive peptide sequencing model that incorporates a structured protein sequence curriculum learning strategy. This approach adjusts protein’s learning difficulty based on the model’s estimated protein generational capabilities through a sampling process, progressively learning peptide generation from simple to complex sequences. Additionally, we introduce a self-refining inference-time module that iteratively enhances predictions using learned NAT token embeddings, improving sequence accuracy at a fine-grained level. Our curriculum learning strategy reduces NAT training failures frequency by more than 90% based on sampled training over various data distributions. Evaluations on nine benchmark species demonstrate that our approach outperforms all previous methods across multiple metrics and species.

Authors

  1. Xiang Zhang (Shanghai AI Lab) · Fudan University, Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, University of British Columbia
  2. Jiaqi Wei · Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Zhejiang University
  3. Zijie Qiu · Fudan University, Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
  4. Sheng Xu · Fudan University, Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
  5. Nanqing Dong · Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
  6. Zhiqiang Gao · Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
  7. Siqi Sun · Fudan University, Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory

Methods and tools

Cites (17)

Cited by (1)

Seen in the charts

Back to the full map

Back to top