Vladimir Gorshkov

7 papers in the catalog · Germany, Russia, Denmark

Vladimir Gorshkov: 7 papers in the catalog · Germany, Russia, Denmark · Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Lomonosov Moscow State University · Works on CID vs HCD for natural peptide de novo, Caucasian green frog skin peptides, Disulfide oxidation…

Affiliations

Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
Lomonosov Moscow State University · Department of Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics
University of Southern Denmark · Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Elsewhere

ORCID 0000-0003-0170-5785 · OpenAlex

Papers

Peptide de novo sequencing of mixture tandem mass spectra (2016, Proteomics)
Protein and Peptide Composition of Male Accessory Glands of Apis mellifera Drones Investigated by Mass Spectrometry (2015, PLOS ONE)
Mass spectrometric de novo sequencing of natural non‐tryptic peptides: comparing peculiarities of collision‐induced dissociation (CID) and high energy collision dissociation (HCD) (2014, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry)
N-terminal tagging strategy forDe Novosequencing of short peptides by ESI-MS/MS and MALDI-MS/MS (2010, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry)
De novo sequencing of peptides secreted by the skin glands of the Caucasian Green Frog Rana ridibunda (2008, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry)
Bioactive peptides from the skin of ranid frogs: modern approaches to the mass spectrometric de novo sequencing (2008, Russian Chemical Bulletin)
Oxidation versus carboxamidomethylation of s-s bond in ranid frog peptides: Pro and contra for de novo MALDI-MS sequencing (2008, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry)

Methods and tools

CID vs HCD for natural peptide de novo, Caucasian green frog skin peptides, Disulfide oxidation for de novo MALDI sequencing, Honeybee drone accessory gland peptides, Mixture MS/MS de novo, N-terminal tagging for de novo of short peptides, Ranid frog peptide de novo review (2008)

Co-authors (16)

Ranked by Newman fractional collaboration strength, so a pair on a two-author paper counts for more than a pair on a 50-author consortium paper.

Albert T. Lebedev strength 1.18, 5 shared
Konstantin A. Artemenko strength 1.18, 5 shared
Tatiana Yu. Samgina strength 1.18, 5 shared
Nikita B. Poljakov strength 0.45, 2 shared
Roman A. Zubarev strength 0.40, 2 shared
Frank Kjeldsen strength 0.33, 1 shared
Stéphanie Yuki Kolbeck Hotta strength 0.33, 1 shared
Thiago Verano-Braga strength 0.33, 1 shared
Andreas Römpp strength 0.20, 1 shared
Andreas Vilcinskas strength 0.20, 1 shared
Bernhard Spengler strength 0.20, 1 shared
Egor A. Vorontsov strength 0.20, 1 shared
Gudrun Koeniger strength 0.20, 1 shared
Sergey V. Kovalev strength 0.20, 1 shared
Sergey V. Ogourtsov strength 0.20, 1 shared
Wolfgang Blenau strength 0.20, 1 shared

Seen in the charts

Back to the full map