Hybrid de novo + database search

10 methods · 2005–2026

Hybrid de novo + database search: Two engines run side by side and reconciled, a de novo sequencer and a database search, each keeping the identifications the other cannot make.

Two engines run side by side and reconciled, a de novo sequencer and a database search, each keeping the identifications the other cannot make.

The earliest of its 10 methods is RAId (2005); 9 more have followed.

Methods 10
Papers describing them 11
Authors 73
Active 2005-10-01 to 2026-10-11
Deep learning 4 of 10
Kinds downstream-application (5), adjacent (4), algorithm
Acquisition DDA (10)

Methods (10)

Oldest first, by the paper that describes each one.

  • RAId (2005): Robust Accurate Identification of peptides: runs de novo sequencing first to estimate spectrum-specific background statistics for a structured peptide library search, falling back on top de novo sequences for novel peptides.
  • Sea urchin neuropeptidome hybrid de novo search (2010): Combines de novo sequencing with search of a translated genome to identify sea urchin neuropeptides, increasing the identification rate by 30%.
  • De novo assisted search for nonspecific phosphopeptides (2014): Makes broad-specificity proteases usable in phosphoproteomics: a conventional database search cannot identify phosphopeptides without enzyme specificity, so de novo sequencing proposes the sequence and the search confirms it.
  • MetaNovo (2019): Matches de novo sequence tags against the whole UniProt knowledgebase and probabilistically ranks proteins to create a tailored database for metaproteomic target-decoy searches, without prior knowledge of sample composition.
  • Peptide-PRISM (2020): Identifies cryptic HLA-I peptides by matching the top de novo sequencing candidates for each spectrum against a six-frame translation of the genome and transcriptome, then scoring them in a stratified FDR; showed cryptic peptides are a substantial part of the HLA-I immunopeptidome.
  • Orthrus (2024): Open-source metaproteomics pipeline combining Casanovo transformer-based de novo sequencing with Sage database search and Mokapot rescoring.
  • HDPS (2025): Heuristic two-round sequence assembly strategy combining multi-enzyme and microwave-assisted acid hydrolysis, pNovo de novo peptide sequencing, and pFind homology database search with k-mer graph assembly and majority-vote error correction; achieved 100% sequence coverage and >98% amino-acid accuracy on full-length Ricin toxin A and B chains without a reference sequence, outperforming ALPS.
  • INSearch (2026): Prototype AI-native database search that replaces the combinatorial scan with retrieval. A dual encoder projects experimental spectra and theoretical peptide sequences into one shared latent space under a contrastive objective with variance regularisation to prevent feature collapse, and an alternative alignment-and-uniformity loss; approximate nearest-neighbour search then returns the top-k candidates, cutting retrieval from the O(S × ρP) of a conventional engine to O(S(log P + K)). Because retrieval is approximate, candidates are re-ranked by InstaNovo’s decoder run in teacher-forcing mode as a scoring function, aggregating residue log-probabilities by geometric mean. On the nine-species benchmark the held-out yeast split reaches Recall@1/5/100 of 60.0/78.9/91.9%, with neural re-scoring lifting Recall@1 to 82.9%; the harder S. brodae proteome reaches only 55.5% Recall@100, pointing to a need for larger-scale training.
  • TIPs (2026): Deep-learning-guided proteogenomic framework that uses de novo sequencing to refine the search space for transposable-element-derived HLA antigens, finding 20-fold more than conventional searches.
  • FastaLake (2026): Metaproteomics workflow that uses full-length AlphaNovo de novo peptide predictions as exact queries to select compact search databases from large sequence reservoirs, then searches them with Sage. Matched metagenome-derived databases in two stool cohorts and found 20-35% more peptides in intestinal fluid, without matched metagenomic sequencing.

Applied in

Neuropeptidomics, Metaproteomics, Toxin identification (biodefense), Immunopeptidomics / neoantigen

Papers describing them (11)

Authors (73)

Andreas Schlosser, Andrew J. M. Nel, Ankit Sinha, Bart Landuyt, Bastian Schilling, Christophe Junot, Dari Shalon, David L. Tabb, Edwin H. Rodriguez, Florian A. Rosenberger, Florian Erhard, Fuli Wang, Geert Baggerman, Gelio Alves, Georg Wallmann, Gerben Menschaert, Hanfa Zou, Hao Wang, Hongqiang Qin, Jerome M. Wendoh, Jessica A. Grembi, Jiale Xu, Jiayi Shen, Jing Dong, Jinqiu Xiao, Johannes B. Mueller-Reif, Jonathan M. Blackburn, Jonathan V. Sweedler, Jonel Trebicka, Jun Zhu, Junjie Wen, Kai Cheng, Karsten Borgwardt, Kathrin Korff, Kerwyn Casey Huang, Lars Dölken, Liliane Schoofs, Mani Arumugam, Marisa I. Keller, Matthew James Collins, Matthias Mann, Matthys G. Potgieter, Maximilian T. Strauss, Maximilian Zwiebel, Michael Kuhn, Mikhail Lebedev, Mingliang Ye, Mingming Dong, Nicola J. Mulder, Peter V. Treit, Philip Hartout, Philipp E. Geyer, Qian Wu, Qizhen Feng, Shaun Garnett, Siyu Zhu, Suereta Fortuin, Tasneem Midhat Mustafa Attaallah, Tom T. M. Vandekerckhove, Vincenth Brennsteiner, Walter Luyten, Wen-Feng Zeng, Wenguang Shao, Wim Van Criekinge, Xiaobing Liu, Xiaoxiang Huang, Xinyue Zhou (Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Yangyang Bian, Yi-Kuo Yu, Yongqian Zhang, Yubo Song, Yun Chiang, Zixiang Shang

Seen in the charts

Back to the full map

Back to top