Combinatorial Labeling Method for Improving Peptide Fragmentation in Mass Spectrometry

peer-reviewed · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2017

peer-reviewed · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2017. Bhanuramanand Kuchibhotla et al. Annotation of peptide sequence from tandem mass spectra constitutes the central step of mass…
Date 2017-06-01
Type peer-reviewed
Venue Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
Publisher American Chemical Society (ACS)
Contribution adjacent
DOI 10.1007/s13361-017-1606-2
Citations (OpenAlex) 17
Venue 2-year citedness 2.84

Abstract

Annotation of peptide sequence from tandem mass spectra constitutes the central step of mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Peptide mass spectra are obtained upon gas-phase fragmentation. Identification of the protein from a set of experimental peptide spectral matches is usually referred as protein inference. Occurrence and intensity of these fragment ions in the MS/MS spectra are dependent on many factors such as amino acid composition, peptide basicity, activation mode, protease, etc. Particularly, chemical derivatizations of peptides were known to alter their fragmentation. In this study, the influence of acetylation, guanidinylation, and their combination on peptide fragmentation was assessed initially on a lipase (LipA) from Bacillus subtilis followed by a bovine six protein mix digest. The dual modification resulted in improved fragment ion occurrence and intensity changes, and this resulted in the equivalent representation of b- and y-type fragment ions in an ion trap MS/MS spectrum. The improved representation has allowed us to accurately annotate the peptide sequences de novo. Dual labeling has significantly reduced the false positive protein identifications in standard bovine six peptide digest. Our study suggests that the combinatorial labeling of peptides is a useful method to validate protein identifications for high confidence protein inference. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Authors

  1. Bhanuramanand Kuchibhotla · Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
  2. Sankara Rao Kola · Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
  3. Jagannadham V. Medicherla · Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
  4. Swamy V. Cherukuvada · Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
  5. Vishnu M. Dhople · Universität Greifswald, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
  6. Madhusudhana Rao Nalam · Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research

Methods and tools

Seen in the charts

Back to the full map

Back to top