Application of de Novo Sequencing to Large-Scale Complex Proteomics Data Sets
peer-reviewed · Journal of Proteome Research · 2016
| Date | 2016-03-04 |
| Type | peer-reviewed |
| Venue | Journal of Proteome Research |
| Publisher | American Chemical Society (ACS) |
| Contribution | downstream-application |
| DOI | 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00861 |
| Citations (OpenAlex) | 50 |
| Venue 2-year citedness | 3.48 |
Abstract
Dependent on concise, predefined protein sequence databases, traditional search algorithms perform poorly when analyzing mass spectra derived from wholly uncharacterized protein products. Conversely, de novo peptide sequencing algorithms can interpret mass spectra without relying on reference databases. However, such algorithms have been difficult to apply to complex protein mixtures, in part due to a lack of methods for automatically validating de novo sequencing results. Here, we present novel metrics for benchmarking de novo sequencing algorithm performance on large-scale proteomics data sets and present a method for accurately calibrating false discovery rates on de novo results. We also present a novel algorithm (LADS) that leverages experimentally disambiguated fragmentation spectra to boost sequencing accuracy and sensitivity. LADS improves sequencing accuracy on longer peptides relative to that of other algorithms and improves discriminability of correct and incorrect sequences. Using these advancements, we demonstrate accurate de novo identification of peptide sequences not identifiable using database search-based approaches.
Methods and tools
- Large-scale de novo application to complex proteomics: Application of de novo sequencing to large-scale complex proteomics data sets.
Cites (12)
- pNovo+: De Novo Peptide Sequencing Using Complementary HCD and ETD Tandem Mass Spectra (2013) crossref
- PEAKS DB: De Novo Sequencing Assisted Database Search for Sensitive and Accurate Peptide Identification (2012) crossref
- Algorithms for the de novo sequencing of peptides from tandem mass spectra (2011) crossref
- ADEPTS: Advanced peptide de novo sequencing with a pair of tandem mass spectra (2010) crossref
- pNovo: De novo Peptide Sequencing and Identification Using HCD Spectra (2010) crossref
- De novo sequencing of peptides by MS/MS (2010) crossref
- De novo peptide sequencing by tandem MS using complementary CID and electron transfer dissociation (2009) crossref
- Proteomics-Grade de Novo Sequencing Approach (2005) crossref
- PepNovo: de novo peptide sequencing via probabilistic network modeling (2005) crossref
- PEAKS: powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry (2003) crossref
- De novo peptide sequencing and quantitative profiling of complex protein mixtures using mass-coded abundance tagging (2002) crossref
- De novo peptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry (1999) crossref
Cited by (10)
- Identification of Species-Specific Peptide Markers in Highly Processed Meat Products Using De Novo Sequencing (2026) crossref
- Limitations of de novo sequencing in resolving sequence ambiguity (2025) crossref
- PepGo: a deep learning and tree search-based model for de novo peptide sequencing (2025) crossref
- Direct Identification of Urinary Tract Pathogens by MALDI-TOF/TOF Analysis and De Novo Peptide Sequencing (2022) both
- Flying blind, or just flying under the radar? The underappreciated power of de novo methods of mass spectrometric peptide identification (2020) crossref
- Postnovo: Postprocessing Enables Accurate and FDR-Controlled de Novo Peptide Sequencing (2018) crossref
- A potential golden age to come—current tools, recent use cases, and future avenues for de novo sequencing in proteomics (2018) crossref
- Combining De Novo Peptide Sequencing Algorithms, A Synergistic Approach to Boost Both Identifications and Confidence in Bottom-up Proteomics (2017) crossref
- Evaluating de novo sequencing in proteomics: already an accurate alternative to database-driven peptide identification? (2017) crossref
- UVnovo: A de Novo Sequencing Algorithm Using Single Series of Fragment Ions via Chromophore Tagging and 351 nm Ultraviolet Photodissociation Mass Spectrometry (2016) both