The Choice of Search Engine Affects Sequencing Depth and HLA Class I Allele-Specific Peptide Repertoires

peer-reviewed · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · 2021

peer-reviewed · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · 2021. Robert Parker et al. Standardization of immunopeptidomics experiments across laboratories is a pressing issue within the field…
Date 2021-07-23
Type peer-reviewed
Venue Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
Publisher Elsevier BV
Contribution benchmark
DOI 10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100124
Citations (OpenAlex) 36
Venue 2-year citedness 4.69

Abstract

Standardization of immunopeptidomics experiments across laboratories is a pressing issue within the field, and currently a variety of different methods for sample preparation and data analysis tools are applied. Here, we compared different software packages to interrogate immunopeptidomics datasets and found that Peaks reproducibly reports substantially more peptide sequences (~30-70%) compared with Maxquant, Comet, and MS-GF+ at a global false discovery rate (FDR) of <1%. We noted that these differences are driven by search space and spectral ranking. Furthermore, we observed differences in the proportion of peptides binding the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles present in the samples, indicating that sequence-related differences affected the performance of each tested engine. Utilizing data from single HLA allele expressing cell lines, we observed significant differences in amino acid frequency among the peptides reported, with a broadly higher representation of hydrophobic amino acids L, I, P, and V reported by Peaks. We validated these results using data generated with a synthetic library of 2000 HLA-associated peptides from four common HLA alleles with distinct anchor residues. Our investigation highlights that search engines create a bias in peptide sequence depth and peptide amino acid composition, and resulting data should be interpreted with caution.

Authors

  1. Robert Parker · University of Oxford
  2. Arun Tailor · University of Oxford
  3. Xu Peng · University of Oxford
  4. Annalisa Nicastri · Jenner Institute, University of Oxford
  5. Johannes Zerweck · JPT Peptide Technologies (Germany), JPT Peptide Technologies GmbH
  6. Ulf Reimer · JPT Peptide Technologies (Germany), JPT Peptide Technologies GmbH
  7. Holger Wenschuh · JPT Peptide Technologies (Germany)
  8. Karsten Schnatbaum · JPT Peptide Technologies (Germany), JPT Peptide Technologies GmbH
  9. Nicola Ternette · Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Utrecht University

Methods and tools

Methods it uses

  • PEAKS: Commercial DP-based de novo
  • PEAKS DB: De-novo-assisted DB search

Data deposited

  • The choice of search engine affects sequencing depth and HLA allele-specific peptide repertoires — as deposited · PXD025655
  • The choice of search engine for interpretation of immunopeptidomics datasets affects the sequencing depth and the extent of detected HLA allele-specific peptide repertoires — as deposited · PXD023202

Cites (2)

Seen in the charts

Back to the full map

Back to top