Transformer (NAR)

10 methods · 2024–2026

Transformer (NAR): Non-autoregressive transformers, which predict every residue position in one forward pass instead of left to right. Faster, and they need an explicit mechanism to keep the residues consistent with the precursor mass.

Non-autoregressive transformers, which predict every residue position in one forward pass instead of left to right. Faster, and they need an explicit mechanism to keep the residues consistent with the precursor mass.

The earliest of its 10 methods is π-PrimeNovo (2024); 9 more have followed.

Methods 10
Papers describing them 15
Authors 54
Active 2024-05-17 to 2026-10-15
Deep learning 10 of 10
Kinds algorithm (9), post-processor
Acquisition DDA (9)

Methods (10)

Oldest first, by the paper that describes each one.

  • π-PrimeNovo (2024): NAR Transformer (CTC)
  • CrossNovo (2025): AR + NAR hybrid
  • RefineNovo (2025): Curriculum learning
  • XuanjiNovo (2025): Billion-scale pretraining
  • DiffNovo (2025): Transformer-diffusion model
  • RT-GCTnovo (2025): Combines Transformer encoders with convolutional layers to capture global and local spectral features, fuses them through a sigmoid gate, adds retention time as a constraint, and decodes semi-autoregressively with dynamic mass masks.
  • OmniNovo (2025): PTM-aware NAR
  • Prime-DiffNovo (2026): Non-autoregressive Transformer de novo peptide sequencer with a diffusion-based refinement step at inference time: the NAR pass drafts a full sequence in parallel, and the diffusion loop iteratively corrects residue predictions to sharpen accuracy.
  • FoxNovo (2026): Non-autoregressive de novo sequencer specialised for HLA-I immunopeptides. Uses dual-token m/z encoding (integer + decimal vocabularies, ~4k tokens instead of ~3M fine-grained bins) in the spectrum encoder, then dynamic-programming top-K decoding over the NAR probability matrix to enforce exact precursor-mass constraints. Reaches >90% peptide accuracy at ~2,800 spectra/s, over 100x faster than the beam-search baseline, and was used to re-analyse 168M spectra from 4,423 raw files in 18 h on one GPU, recovering 41 of 42 targeted-MS-validated non-canonical peptides.
  • ScopeNovo (2026): Spectral-library reranking of π-PrimeNovo candidates

How they score

1 of the 10 has been run on denovo_benchmarks, which ranks 14 tools over 86 datasets. The family’s best median rank is 5.

  • π-PrimeNovo: median peptide-level average precision 0.802, median rank 5 of 14

Read these next to the rest of the field, not on their own: what the numbers mean.

Papers describing them (15)

Authors (54)

Binhai Zhu (Montana State University), Bowen Zhou, Boyan Sun, Chang-Rong You, Cheng Chang, Chenghui Liu, Chenyu You, Ching Tarn, Fuchu He, Guangshuai Wang, Guibin Wang, Hang Zhang, Jiancheng Li, Jiaqi Wei, Jun A, Kunyi Li, Laks V.S. Lakshmanan, Lei Bai, Leyuan Li, Liujia Qian, Lusheng Wang, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed, Nan Liu (Shandong Jianzhu University), Nanqing Dong, Ning Ding, Ningning Qiu, Pu Liu, Shang Qu, Sheng Xu, Shiva Ebrahimi, Siqi Sun, Te Zhang, Tiannan Guo, Tianze Ling, Wanli Ouyang, Wen-Feng Zeng, Xiang Zhang (Shanghai AI Lab), Xiaofan Zhang, Xie-Xuan Zhou, Xinjie Mao, Xuan Guo, Xuan Yu, Yamin Deng, Yi Chen, Yiwen Yu, Yuejin Yang, Yuhan Chen, Ze-Xuan Chen, Zejian Ding, Zhi Jin, Zhi Song, Zhiqiang Gao, Zijie Qiu, Zongxiang Nie

Seen in the charts

Back to the full map

Back to top